Kaleidoscope Series - Lesson 3
Defensive Doubles
-------------------------------------------------------
Consider this auction:
Opener
| You
| Responder
| Advancer
|
1♥
| 2♦
| 2♥
| 3♦
|
4♥
| ??
|
Not vulnerable versus vulnerable opponents,
a 5
♦ sacrifice seems to be an option. But how do we
know if 4
♥ will make ?
How do we know how much defensive
strength Partner has ?
Only if playing defensive Doubles, can we have
any chance of making an
"educated" guess.
Now we look at this hand (Matchpoints, with
them vulnerable) after 1
♥-1
♠-2
♥:
Overcaller:
| K Q J x x x
| A x x
| x x
| x
|
Advancer A:
| A x x
| x
| x x x x
| Q x x x
|
Advancer B:
| x x x
| x x
| K 10 9 x
| A Q x
|
Opener | Overcaller | Responder | Advancer
|
1 | 1 | 2 | ?
|
Advancer should anticipate that the next bid
from Opener may well be 4
♥. Overcaller will now be
"on the spot", and will need to know if 4
♠ is worth
considering as a sacrifice.
Certainly, from Overcaller's
perspective, 4
♠ looks attractive.
But, there is a world
of difference between the two Advancer hands A and B above.
With Advancer A, 4
♠ should be an excellent sacrifice
against 4
♥. Opposite Advancer B, though, Overcaller
would likely want to try
defending 4
♥.
Opener | Overcaller | Responder | Advancer
|
1 | 1 | 2 | 2
|
4 | ??
|
But,
both Advancers will likely bid 2
♠ over 1
♥-1
♠-2
♥.
How does Overcaller guess which type Advancer has
this time ?
The answer, in short, is to play Defensive Doubles.
---- A Glossary of Some Helpful Terms ----
Before we can comprehend Defensive Doubles, we
need an understanding of competitive bidding strategy
themes and expressions. These expressions may help:
1.
"Defensive Values" = Aces and Face cards
other than
the Queen or Jack of a suit, that WE are bidding,
are
"defensive values", since they may take a trick
on defence. If they play the hand,
♦Qxx has a
much better chance of taking a trick, if we have
not bid diamonds than if we
have bid Diamonds.
The King of our long suit is a defensive value
only if the odds favour both opponents having
two cards in our suit. Hence, if we have more
than 9 cards in our suit, the King is
not a
defensive value, since it will surely be ruffed
if they play in a suit contract. Since a 2-2
break is only a 40% chance, if we have a
nine
card fit the King of our long suit is more often
not a defensive value.
2.
"Defensively Orientated" = A hand with substantial
HCPs and flattish distribution is liable to be
more good on defence than in winning the contract.
Typically, a
"defensively oriented" hand should
be an odds-on favourite to take 2 or more tricks on defence.
3.
"Convertible Values" = Aces and Kings are liable to
be good on offense (i.e., declaring) or defence.
This is not nearly as true of Queens and Jacks,
which may be useless for offense, defence or
both. Aces and Kings, then, are considered
"convertible" values. Aces and Kings are also
called [Neapolitan]
"controls". Any hand with
many Aces and Kings, then, is
"control rich"
and therefore has a lot of
"convertible values".
4.
"Offensive Values" = Offensive values include any
extra trump length, any ruffing value, any face
card in our long suit(s), and any Ace or King
in any outside suit.
5.
"Offensively Orientated" = Any hand that has a lot
of offensive values is deemed to be offensively
oriented. Typically, an offensively oriented
hand will have
fewer than 2 defensive tricks
if they should declare the hand.
Example Hands
If
opponents are bidding this majors, this
hand has significant defensive values
and would be considered
"defensively oriented".
If Partner has just shown
the majors, though, this hand has
significant
offensive values, and is
offensively oriented. It has
very few convertible values, though.
This hand may well be useless on offence
if, say, Partner makes an Unusual 2NT
over 1
♥ or 1
♠ by LHO.
Unless Partner has just pre-empted
in Hearts, this hand has signicant
defensive potential. It is control
rich, with good convertible values
in the majors. We would not be
interested in sacrificing at the
game level, unless Partner has shown 6+ Hearts.
K Q J x
A x x
10 x x x x
J
This hand starts out as a defensive type,
with 2 or 3 tricks in the majors.
Once Partner overcalls 1
♠, though, our Spade
defensive tricks go up in smoke, and this
becomes an offensively oriented holding.
----------- Quiz #1 --------------
- After 1♦-1♠-2♦, rate the following hands as
"defensively" or "offensively" oriented:
a.
| J x x
| K Q x x
| x x
| K x x
|
b.
| K Q x x
| J x x
| x x
| K x x
|
c.
| A x x x
| K 10 x x
| x x x
| Q
|
d.
| K Q x x
| K 10 9
| x x x
| Q x
|
-
You would never raise, after 1♦-1♠-Dble with this hand.
If you had to choose, though, would you
consider this hand offensive or defensive ?
---- Defensive Doubles and their Effect ----
Playing Defensive Doubles affects how Advancer
(the partner of the Overcaller) shows support (3+ cards)
or
"tolerance" (2+ cards) for Overcaller's suit.
First, we operate from the understanding that Advancer's entry
into the auction is very dangerous, if she/he does
not have support for Overcaller's suit.
When playing Defensive Doubles, such an Advancer will have to bid
*beyond* partner's suit. e.g.,
West | North | East | South
|
1
| 2
| 2
| ??
|
|
— 3 supports Diamonds,
|
3 or 4 would not.
|
|
Defensive Doubles come into effect in competitive
auctions only (i.e., when Opener's partner, "Responder",
has made a negative Double or a free suit bid). Any bid
by Advancer, then, up to and including Overcaller's suit,
suggests support. In such instances, the following
rules apply:
Any raise, *including a single direct raise*, shows an
offensively oriented hand. If the opponents bounce to
game, Advancer's vote is deemed to suggest a sacrifice. e.g.,
Overcaller:
| K Q J x x x
| A x x
| x x
| x
|
Advancer A:
| A x x
| x
| x x x x
| Q x x x
|
West | North | East | South
| 1♥
| 1♠
| 2♥
| 2♠
|
4♥ | ??
|
|
2♠ = Offensively oriented raise.
|
Overcaller should feel free to bid 4♠, knowing
that this is Advancer's preference.
|
|
Any suit bid below Overcaller's bid is lead-directing,
but shows good defensive strength — no interest in
sacrificing, if the opponents stumble into game.
Advancer:
J x x
A Q J
x x x
Q x x
|
2♥ = Spade tolerance. "Lead Hearts!"
|
Any Notrump bid below Overcaller's shows
"scattered but significant defensive values" —
no interest in sacrificing against any game contract.
Advancer:
Q x x
K 10 x
Q x x x
Q x
West | North | East | South
|
1
| 1
| Dble*
| 1NT
|
|
1NT = "Scattered defensive values."
*Negative Double.
|
Any Double shows defensive strength (no interest in
sacrificing against a game contract) but no room to
make the appropriate lead directing or
"scattered
values" free bid.
Advancer:
A x x x
10 x x
K x x
Q J
West | North | East | South
| 1 | 1 | 2 | Dble
|
|
Dble = Heart support. Defence.
|
A Redouble of a Negative Double is also defensive,
suggesting the Ace or King of Overcaller's suit — especially
at the 1-level. This is called a
"Rosencrantz" Redouble.
Advancer:
K x x
K 10 x x
x x
A x x
West | North | East | South
| 1 | 1 | Dble* | Rdble
|
|
Rdble = ♥K/Ace. Defence.
|
To appreciate the effect of playing Defensive Doubles, consider this common scenario:
Overcaller:
A Q 10 x x
K x x
x x
x x
West | North | East | South
| 1 | 1 | 2 | Dble
| 3NT | Pass | Pass | Pass
|
|
Dble = Spades: "Don't lead Hearts !"
(else 2♥ here)
|
A major suit lead at the other table gave your
team mates +600. Trusting Declarer to hold at least
the ♠K, you, North, find the "miraculous" lead of
a Club. Sure enough, Partner gets in with ♣A
and tracks ♠J for down two.
Any other lead would have handed them 600. While
one opponent checks you for wires, you explain to the
other that Partner's Double and the 3NT bid essentially
eliminated any
other lead from serious consideration.
The opponents don't seem mollified, though... :)
----------- Quiz #2 --------------
- After 1♠-2♦-2♠, with neither side vulnerable,
what is your call, if holding:
(a)
| A Q J 9
| A x x
| x
| x x x x
|
(b)
| J x x
| K Q J x x
| Q x x
| Q
|
(c)
| 10 x x x
| J
| Q x x x
| Q J x
|
- Is a Double of a free 1NT bid Defensive ? For
example, is 1♣-1♥-1NT-Dble Defensive or Penalty?
---- When Doubles are NOT Defensive ----
Defensive Doubles come in direct seat only, and
only
immediately upon hearing of Partner's suit. The
following examples are
NOT defensive Doubles, and do
NOT suggest support for Overcaller's suit:
(1)
| West | North | East | South
| | 1 | 1 | Pass | Pass
| | Dbld | Pass | 2 | 2
|
|
2♥ = Natural, 0-2 Spades.
|
(2)
| West | North | East | South
| | 1 | 1 | Pass | Pass
| | 2 | Pass | Pass | 2
|
|
2♥ = Natural, 0-2 Spades.
|
The Defensive Double structure does not apply,
if RHO has just bid a natural 1NT freely over Partner's
overcall.
(3)
| West | North | East | South
| | 1 | 1 | 1NT | Dble
|
|
Dble = Strong hand. Penalty.
|
(4)
| West | North | East | South
| | 1 | 1 | 1NT | 2
|
|
2♦ = Natural, NON-forcing.
|
(5)
| West | North | East | South
| | 1 | 1 | 1NT | 2
|
|
2♠ = Competitive only.
|
--- Bidding at Unfavorable Vulnerablility ---
At unfavourable vulnerability (i.e., us vulnerable,
them not), sacrificing is not usually an issue for us.
For this reason, instead of Advancer defining hir
opinion about sacrificing, Advancer expresses hir
attitute towards Overcaller leading their suit.
We accomplish this by using Rosencrantz-style Doubles and
Redoubles.
Over a Negative Double at the
one-level, Advancer
will
raise with the Queen, and Redouble with the Ace or
King. A 1NT free bid shows scattered values — NONE of
them in Overcaller's suit. Many will use these same
bids opposite a
two-level overcall by Partner.
"How high shall we play our Rosencrantz Redoubles ?" is a
good question to pose any new partner.
This structure is used whenever there
IS a NoTrump
bid available. After 1
♣-1
♦-1
♥, a Double will
promise the Diamond Ace or King, 2
♦ will show the
♦Q (when vulnerable versus not) and 1NT
will show scattered values with NO Diamond Ace, King
or Queen. We might describe the 1NT free bid by Advancer
as showing
"scattered values outside Overcaller's suit".
When there is
not a NoTrump bid available,
as over 1
♥-1
♠-2
♥, the Double shows a
"top honour" while the raise
denies one. The only question that remains is whether
the Queen of Overcaller's suit should be considered a
"top honour". Many say that it should be, and will Double
with the Ace, King or Queen.
Other pairs make a slight refinement here. If
it seems likely that the opponents will end up in
a major suit, Advancer shows the Ace or King with a
Double. Only if it sounds as if the opponents are
more likely to end up in NoTrump than a major
(e.g., by bidding minors and/or NoTrump only) does
Advancer show the Ace, King
OR QUEEN with a Double.
(1)
| West | North | East | South
| | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2
|
|
2♠ = No Spade Ace, King or Queen.
|
Here, without a Negative Double or major suit bid by Responder, there is little chance of Opener's
side playing in a major. So, 2
♠, here, denies
any of the top three Spades.
(2)
| West | North | East | South
| | 1 | 1 | 2 | Dble
|
|
Dble = ♠Ace, ♠King and/or ♠Queen.
|
Because 2NT would bypass the Spade suit, we cannot
distinguish the
♠Q from the King or Ace.
(3)
| West | North | East | South
| | 1 | 1 | Dble | 2
|
| 2♠ = ♠Q.
|
Over a Negative Double, we
always have a NoTrump
bid handy to show
none of the top three honours.
Hence, a raise always shows the Queen.
(4)
| West | North | East | South
| | 1 | 1 | Dble | Rdble
|
| Rdble = Spade Ace and/or King.
|
A Redouble always shows the Ace or King of Overcaller's suit.
(5)
| West | North | East | South
| | 1 | 1 | Dble | 1NT
|
| 1NT = No Space Ace, King or Queen.
|
NoTrump bids, when available, always deny any
of the top three honours in Partner's suit.
(6)
| West | North | East | South
| | 1 | 1 | 2 | Dble
|
| Dble = Spade Ace and/or King.
|
Because there is not a NoTrump available here, and
because the opposite
has shown major suit interest,
the Double here promises the Ace or King. With
the Queen (or less) Advancer could bid 2
♠.
----------- Quiz #3 --------------
1. After 1
♠-2
♥-2
♠, vulnerable against non-vulnerable
opponents, what is your call if holding:
---- Snapdragon Defensive Doubles ----
Once you are comfortable with Defensive Doubles,
you might consider adding
"Snapdragon" Defensive
Doubles to your arsenal. Whenever Advancer has at
hir disposal a 1NT call, to show scattered values in
support of Overcaller's suit, a Double will show
4+ cards in any unbid major. Snapdragon Defensive
Doubles are not made at unfavourable vulnerability.
(1)
| West | North | East | South
| | 1 | 1 | 1 | Dble
|
|
Dble = 4+ Spades, defence,
Diamond tolerance.
|
(2)
| West | North | East | South
| | 1 | 1 | 2 | Dble
|
| Dble = Defensive only.
|
The second auction is
NOT a Snapdragon Double,
since Advancer did
NOT have the option of bidding
in NoTrump to show scattered values. 2NT there
would go
beyond the Diamond suit.
Some will play Snapdragon Redoubles instead of
the Rosencrantz Redouble (showing an Ace or King in
Overcaller's suit) except when
VUL versus
NOT.
West | North | East | South
| 1 | 1 | Dble* | RDble
|
|
Rdble = 4+ Hearts, defence,
Spade tolerance.
|
Snapdragon
defensive Doubles are distinguished
from normal Snapdragon Doubles in that
defensive
ones show defensive values and always promise
tolerance for Overcaller's suit.
Also, Defensive
Snapdragon Doubles are slightly less common, since
they only come up with Advancer has the option of
bidding a
"scattered values" NoTrump, when Advancer
does
not have 4+ cards in the unbid major.
----------- Quiz #4 --------------
- None vulnerable. Playing Snapdragon Defensive Doubles,
what is our call after 1♦-1♠-2♦ with:
10 x x x
J
A 10 x x
K Q x
Hint: Careful ! This is a trick question ! :)
- Vulnerable versus not, playing Snapdragon Defensive
Doubles, what is our call after 1♣-1♦-1♠ with:
x x
K Q x x
10 x x x
K Q x
Hint: Careful again ! Another trick question !
-
Both Vulnerable, playing Snapdragon Defensive Doubles,
what is our call after 1♦-2♣-2♠ holding:
K x
K J 10 x x
10 x x
Q x
- Both Vulnerable, playing Snapdragon Defensive Doubles and Redoubles,
what is our call after
1♦-1♥-Dble holding:
(a)
A K Q
x x x
10 x x
Q x x
(b)
Q J 9 x x
x x x
K 10 x
A
Hint: The Double *suggested* 4 Spades in Responder's hand. It didn't *guarantee*
4 Spades in Responder's hand.
---- Discussing Defensive Doubles ----
Because they are not well known, or are known
by other names, Defensive Doubles would have to be
discussed thoroughly with any new partner. Simply
sitting down and saying
"Responsive Doubles through
3♥, Pard ?" might be fine for Responder Doubles, but
one does not start out with a new partner by asking:
"Defensive Doubles, Pard?"
In addition to discussion, Defensive Doubles
will require
practice. One such discussion point
would be whether a new suit at the
three level
beyond Overcaller's suit is forcing or not.
e.g., 1
♣-1
♠-2
♥-3
♦ — Forcing ?
In standard treatments, any such 3-level free
bid in a new suit
would be forcing, but many
Defensive Doublers play it as NON-forcing.
To recap then our actions
BELOW Overcaller's suit:
VUL versus NOT:
Over a BID by RHO:
|
Double = Top Honour in Overcaller's suit.
|
Raise = No Top Honour in Overcaller's suit.
|
— "Top Honour" can mean Ace or King, OR Ace, King or Queen,
|
depending on whether 1NT is available, and whether or not
|
the opponents have shown Major-suit length.
|
NoTrump = No Ace, King or Queen in Overcaller's suit.
|
Over a Negative Double:
|
Redouble = Ace or King of Overcaller's suit.
|
Raise = The Queen of Overcaller's suit.
|
NoTrump = Denies Ace, King or Queen of Overcaller's suit.
|
At any OTHER vulnerability:
Over a BID by RHO:
|
Double = Defensive values. Some play as Snapdragon.
|
Raise = Offensive values.
|
NoTrump = Scattered defensive values.
|
Over a Negative Double:
|
Redouble = Ace or King of Overcaller's suit.
|
NoTrump = Denies Ace or King of Overcaller's suit.
|
At ALL vulnerabilities:
New suits are always lead-directing, with defence.
|
---- Final Quiz ----
-
How do Defensive Doubles affect Advancer's actions with an
INVITATIONAL raise ? Say,
with 13 points and good support for Overcaller's Spades
after 1♦-1♠-2♦ ? Hint: 3♠ is PRE-EMPTIVE.
- What do you bid, at MPs, non-Vul versus Vul opponents,
after 1♦-1♠-2♦ with:
(a)
| 10 x x
| A J 10
| x x x
| K x x
|
(b)
| J 10 x x
| x x x
| x
| Q x x x
|
(c)
| Q x x
| x x x
| x x
| A K x x
|
(d)
| K J x x
| x
| A x x x
| A x x
|
(e)
| K Q x
| J x x
| x x
| J x x x
|
(f)
| 10 x
| Q J x x
| A Q 10
| K 10 x
|
-
Neither vulnerable, at MPs, what is your
call after 1♠-2♦-2♥ holding:
(a)
| A 10 x
| K x x
| Q x x x
| J x
|
(b)
| x x
| A Q J x
| J 10 x
| K 10 x
|
(c)
| 10 x x x
| x
| K J x x x
| x x
|
(d)
| x x
| A Q 10 x
| K x x
| A J 10
|
********* The Rubber Bridge Theory of Relativity *********
* *
* High Card Points x I.Q. Points = a constant *
* *
**********************************************************
saved from url=http://www.firesides.ca/kaleido3.htm